yes we can't tolerate the intollerants
now that i think of it, can bonfire not follow mastodon on the ''like'' = star thing?lol
everytime i click on it i have years of star= favorite bookmark taught by internet in the brain
a bonfire is a fire sooooooooooooooo, maybe a fire reaction? no likes, only hyped fires 😁
@zabbeer @ivan @lefterino Yeah I think showing the number of comments (both in feeds and at the top of a discussion page) would be useful. Maybe better to not show the number of boosts/likes by default though, and either make that a setting you enable or a toggle/button/menu to explicitly choose when see them.
now that i think of it, can bonfire not follow mastodon on the ''like'' = star thing?lol
everytime i click on it i have years of star= favorite bookmark taught by internet in the brain
a bonfire is a fire sooooooooooooooo, maybe a fire reaction? no likes, only hyped fires 😁
No doubt Discourse's stats are awesome!
I would say it would be nice to have those avatars at the bottom of people who have engaged in the conversation - showing first the people you follow or you mostly engage with and an option to expand to get the whole list of people who interacted with the post. Maybe -this could be controversial- an AI-derived icon next to people's avatars in the list indicating if they agree or disagree with the original post.
@jl I also agree that participant avatars are a relevant info to show 👍️ .
Re. AI: we actually did some very first experiments in the field of sentiment analysis , but to properly integrate AI in bonfire we need to do some work on the infrastructure side, to avoid putting any strain on the (typically small VPS) instance’s server
@ivan @lefterino My first impression is that this is a good idea. Are there any expected/unexpected downsides to this?
@zabbeer @ivan @lefterino Yeah I think showing the number of comments (both in feeds and at the top of a discussion page) would be useful. Maybe better to not show the number of boosts/likes by default though, and either make that a setting you enable or a toggle/button/menu to explicitly choose when see them.
for sure what helps me to engage is the comments number. that works for me more than any other stat, cause i see there is a discussion i can learn from and eventually engage in.
anyway maybe you could put a little counter on or under every of the buttons that are already there?
like:
- under or on the right of the reply button, the number of the replies already there
- under or on the right of the repost button, the number of the repost already made and you can see who did it by clicking on it
etc etc
@ivan @lefterino My first impression is that this is a good idea. Are there any expected/unexpected downsides to this?
At present, our discussion page lacks any statistical data about the thread, a feature that is pretty common in most of social networks or forums. These platforms typically display a total count of replies, boosts, likes, and participants.
Take Discourse as an example, a platform with a great UX for productive conversations. Discourse displays the list of links shared in a post and provides a statistical box that details thread engagement. This includes also an approximation of the time required to read through the entire thread, if significant.
What are some meaningful statistics we must/should incorporate for the Bonfire 1.0 release? We are seeking to find statistics that can effectively foster engagement in discussions without solely promoting addictive behaviors. Any thoughts or suggestions ? #bonifre_feedback
for sure what helps me to engage is the comments number. that works for me more than any other stat, cause i see there is a discussion i can learn from and eventually engage in.
anyway maybe you could put a little counter on or under every of the buttons that are already there?
like:
- under or on the right of the reply button, the number of the replies already there
- under or on the right of the repost button, the number of the repost already made and you can see who did it by clicking on it
etc etc
At present, our discussion page lacks any statistical data about the thread, a feature that is pretty common in most of social networks or forums. These platforms typically display a total count of replies, boosts, likes, and participants.
Take Discourse as an example, a platform with a great UX for productive conversations. Discourse displays the list of links shared in a post and provides a statistical box that details thread engagement. This includes also an approximation of the time required to read through the entire thread, if significant.
What are some meaningful statistics we must/should incorporate for the Bonfire 1.0 release? We are seeking to find statistics that can effectively foster engagement in discussions without solely promoting addictive behaviors. Any thoughts or suggestions ? #bonifre_feedback
glitch?
Here's the glitchy thread. Also, I had a user experience breakdown when trying to add ALT text to this tall screenshot (the ALT text window wasn't tall enough to display the text box at the bottom). #bonfire_feedback
Time for more glitches
La maltraitance numérique
Addiction et biopouvoirMes réflexions sur la maltraitance de classe viennent d'une étude des dispositifs de pouvoir (Foucault, 1975) des réseaux socio-capitalistes (RSC). Je me suis ensuite rendue compte que le phénomène était à peu près similaires dans toutes les autres…
Océane ⏚
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father, prepare to die.
It is a far, far better thing that I do now, than I have ever done.
🦍 🏢 ⚾️ 🥾 ♿️ 🦾 🍨
What's different to Mastodon here?
@pabs Lots, apparently
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father, prepare to die.
Yes, works like a charm now! ✨
I love the graphics, anyway
What's different to Mastodon here?
Trying to figure out if what I'm seeing is a bug or just that I have no data yet. 🤔
Using Firefox and stuck with a light theme. After I select another theme it flicks for a second, and reverts to a white and blue theme.
#bonfire_feedback
I don't see valueflows extension in the settings is that one not quite at that stage yet?
anyway, I like the minimise post, it allows you to have a look around when you are composing.
There was an error when I tried to search for a mastodon account in the search bar using '@username@hostname' format.
