piccolo test
random test numero non lo so
random test number random
random testerino random
lefterino
boosted
Hello everyone, I implemented a #Guix System service [0] for #Bonfire that I'm running on a physical machine [1] at home. It uses the OCI image under the hood and I took most of the implementation details from CoopCloud's recipe.
Bonfire starts correctly but when I go to the signup page I get a 500 error. I'm attaching the log for the request. It seems to me a bug or some strange boolean comparison but I still don't know elixir good enough to understand. Do you have any inputs on what I might be doing wrong?
Thanks!
modules/frastanato/system/config.scm · main · Giacomo Leidi / Guix Deployments · GitLab (object)
GitLab.com
~fishinthecalculator/gocix (main): modules/oci/services/bonfire.scm - sourcehut git (link)
@lefterino gli admin possono decidere il tema di default di un'istanza (in questo caso un tema scuro: bonfire) ma l'utente può cambiare il tema nei settings qui: campground.bonfire.cafe/sett...
@ivan ah ok quindi è come se aveste scelto di default per il tema chiaro un tema scuro
direi che o serve un nuovo pulsante per dire ''admin'' o boh, io da system mi aspetto che semplicemente diventa chiaro o scuro a seconda del mio sistema e del tema preferito chiaro e tema preferito scuro che ho scelto
@ivan mac m2, firefox, entrambi aggiornati, il tema automatico mi mette su tema scuro
testando di nuovo la velocità di posting
regular posting speed test number: idk
testo nuovamente se la posting speed è migliorata
uelà stavolta è decisamente migliorata, nice!
testo nuovamente se la posting speed è migliorata
testing if the posting speed is now faster
test
to check if the title is also markdown recognized
sa sa sa
No doubt Discourse's stats are awesome!
I would say it would be nice to have those avatars at the bottom of people who have engaged in the conversation - showing first the people you follow or you mostly engage with and an option to expand to get the whole list of people who interacted with the post. Maybe -this could be controversial- an AI-derived icon next to people's avatars in the list indicating if they agree or disagree with the original post.
wdym with agree or disagree? i mean, the ''ai'' would first check the post and then try to understand if my comment agrees and if it does the icon is different?
@zabbeer @ivan @lefterino Yeah I think showing the number of comments (both in feeds and at the top of a discussion page) would be useful. Maybe better to not show the number of boosts/likes by default though, and either make that a setting you enable or a toggle/button/menu to explicitly choose when see them.
now that i think of it, can bonfire not follow mastodon on the ''like'' = star thing?lol
everytime i click on it i have years of star= favorite bookmark taught by internet in the brain
a bonfire is a fire sooooooooooooooo, maybe a fire reaction? no likes, only hyped fires 😁
@ivan thinking about communities and groups that would work VERY well on bonfire, i noticed that there is a lack of:
- markets
- inventories
With shared inventories + circle you could basically create any library of things or diffused library on the territory
with markets, well a curated little used local market
sorry for the direct tag 😊
At present, our discussion page lacks any statistical data about the thread, a feature that is pretty common in most of social networks or forums. These platforms typically display a total count of replies, boosts, likes, and participants.
Take Discourse as an example, a platform with a great UX for productive conversations. Discourse displays the list of links shared in a post and provides a statistical box that details thread engagement. This includes also an approximation of the time required to read through the entire thread, if significant.
What are some meaningful statistics we must/should incorporate for the Bonfire 1.0 release? We are seeking to find statistics that can effectively foster engagement in discussions without solely promoting addictive behaviors. Any thoughts or suggestions ? #bonifre_feedback
for sure what helps me to engage is the comments number. that works for me more than any other stat, cause i see there is a discussion i can learn from and eventually engage in.
anyway maybe you could put a little counter on or under every of the buttons that are already there?
like:
- under or on the right of the reply button, the number of the replies already there
- under or on the right of the repost button, the number of the repost already made and you can see who did it by clicking on it
etc etc