Ello🤗
ah interesting, nested replies in reverse cronological order (newer first) may confuse the discussion...
In this screenshot, my "agree" comment was directed to @mayel first comment (see the date time), while instead in this visualisation seems referred to @lne comment (that was more recent than my reply)
@lne super interesting, wondering if it is a valid metric though and in which ways it may have privacy implication ? A thread may have a lot of flagged activities because it talks about a complex topic (covid, politics, religion, gender ...) and users want to properly moderate it, on the contrary a thread without flagged activities may be just not moderated at all and being full of trolls ?
Maybe we can show a label only when the amount of flags exceed a certain amount (eg. after 30 flags on the whole thread) - as an indication 🤔
@ivan
> which ways it may have privacy implication ?
My intuition is that the number of flags in a thread would have the same privacy implications as any other aggregated metric (#posts, #likes, #people,...). Discourse folds flagged posts, which should have about the same privacy implications as showing the number of likes.
Or am I missing something?
warning: mindblowing stuff happening inside this post
Ok the editor role is now added...
@ivan can you try editing this comment? mixed by ivan
It works 😀
And we'll be adding an editor role to use boundaries & circles to collaborate on posts!
warning: mindblowing stuff happening inside this post
Ok the editor role is now added...
@ivan can you try editing this comment? mixed by ivan
Here's what the new post editing feature currently looks like (with a history of edits showing what was changed). You can find it in the dropdown next to a post, try it out and let us know what you think!
And we'll be adding an editor role to use boundaries & circles to collaborate on posts!
🚀 Reflecting on a productive week focused on enhancing discussions on Bonfire!
Here our major improvements:
✨ Give a title to your discussions
📊 View discussion metrics for better insights
🔍 Read discussions seamlessly with an optimised legibility experience
✏️ Bonus: Edit posts!
Next week, we'll focus on federating threads and iterate with the community to squash bugs and enhance user experience.
Here's what the new post editing feature currently looks like (with a history of edits showing what was changed). You can find it in the dropdown next to a post, try it out and let us know what you think!
🚀 Reflecting on a productive week focused on enhancing discussions on Bonfire!
Here our major improvements:
✨ Give a title to your discussions
📊 View discussion metrics for better insights
🔍 Read discussions seamlessly with an optimised legibility experience
✏️ Bonus: Edit posts!
Next week, we'll focus on federating threads and iterate with the community to squash bugs and enhance user experience.
This will be a long long thread
(1/x)
More content
(2/x)
This will be a long long thread
(1/x)
Aufbruch! Piratenpartei stellt Liste zur Europawahl 2024 auf
Am vergangenen Wochenende wählte die Piratenpartei Deutschland auf ihrer zweitägigen Aufstellungsversammlung in Magdeburg die Listenkandidat:innen zur Europawahl. Die zwanzigköpfige Liste wird mit einem Spitzentrio in den Wahlkampf gehen.Spitzenkandidatin Anja Hirschel…
Piratenpartei News (NRW)
2 media files
Welcome
Welcome to my bonfire posts. I am going to make some posts (more brilliant, more common, more irrelevant, more relevant, more happy, more interesting, more... and more... and more..
How?
In this way, long and I am going to explain some concepts and call (or request) for comments, with #bonfireRFC
https://www.connectedaction.net/tag/threaded-conversation/
Perhaps there is an idea for an algorithm in this report.
Here's another example of quantifying elements of a thread with real world example: https://sites.dartmouth.edu/learninganalytics/2016/01/26/the-application-of-social-network-analysis-in-canvas-discussion/
From a data portability perspective, when an actor moves themselves (and their past posts) to a new instance, each post in a thread can contain a vector of the original posting "punch" based on metrics. When the actor's past posts are discovered by the actors of the new instance it may spawn a new thread graph. This implies these "punch" metrics are supported in the new instance. Maybe as a microsyntax?
Another thing about the metric... trust and robustness to editing and deleting. If the post is moved by the actor(owner), trust in the "punch" allocated on the initial thread and robustness to subsequent editing (before or after move) would need to be incorporated in the "punch" metric.
Just arbitrary, calling it "punch". There is probably an official name in some standard (that I haven't found). I think it is equivalent to the flame icon mentioned elsewhere. To first order, ActivityPub (AP) spec seems to put it in the "microsyntax" vocabulary with "may" connection with other AP implementations (?languages?... Mastodon, et al.). It doesn't seem to be an ActivityType such as Like (in the AP spec). I looked in the Bonfire documentation, but I don't know how to find how the "flame" maps to AP.
Hello World 😉
@KazukyAkayashi welcome 🤗
Hello World 😉
🔥 We've just rolled out a new feature: thread titles.
Add a title to your thread - either initially or add it later as discussions develop and edit it if the discussion takes another direction. We're exploring if this offers more context to discussions, driving better user participation and streamlining discussion management. Try it and let us know what you think!
Meta on content warnings
@ivan I like how this now makes the difference between a title and a content warning clearer.
Sa Sa Prova
Ciao, qui è bonfire
